Skip to main content

LLM Tool Ecosystem

An interactive guide to understanding the LLM tool ecosystem architecture.

View Interactive Diagram →

Overview​

This comprehensive guide covers the complete architectural stack of the LLM tool ecosystem:

  • Tool Calling - Foundation layer enabling LLMs to request structured actions
  • Model Context Protocol (MCP) - Protocol layer standardizing tool integration
  • AI Agents & LangChain - Orchestration layer coordinating complex workflows
  • Claude Skills & Commands - Application layer providing user-facing capabilities

Key Concepts​

Tool Calling (Foundation Layer)​

Tool calling is the fundamental capability that allows LLMs to generate structured function requests in JSON format. This is the foundation upon which all other layers are built.

Key Characteristics:

  • Model generates JSON specifying function name and arguments
  • Model suggests but does NOT execute functions
  • All LLM providers support this (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta)
  • Client-side code is responsible for execution

When to use: Simple API calls and basic function invocation.

Model Context Protocol (MCP)​

MCP is an open standard that standardizes how tools integrate with LLM applications. Think of it as "USB-C for AI" - one protocol that connects multiple systems.

Key Characteristics:

  • Client-server architecture with JSON-RPC transport
  • Solves the N×M integration problem
  • Dynamic tool discovery
  • Vendor-agnostic and growing ecosystem
  • Uses tool calling underneath

When to use: Multi-system integration requiring standardized tool access.

AI Agents​

AI Agents are autonomous systems where LLMs dynamically direct their own processes and tool usage. Unlike workflows with predefined paths, agents make independent decisions based on their understanding of goals.

Key Characteristics:

  • LLM-driven autonomous decision-making
  • Multi-step planning and reasoning
  • Short-term and long-term memory management
  • Dynamic tool selection
  • Adapts plans based on feedback

When to use: Complex autonomous tasks requiring flexibility and adaptive decision-making.

Trade-offs: Agents provide flexibility at the cost of predictability. They are non-deterministic, have higher latency, and consume more tokens.

LangChain (Framework)​

LangChain is a framework for orchestrating LLM applications through structured workflows. It provides predefined chains and composable components.

Key Characteristics:

  • Framework-orchestrated workflows
  • Modular Python/JavaScript libraries
  • Chain and workflow planning
  • Framework-managed memory
  • Supports multiple LLM providers

When to use: Structured workflows with predictable execution paths.

Claude Skills​

Claude Skills are filesystem-based capability packages that provide specialized domain expertise. They use progressive disclosure - only metadata is loaded initially, with full content loading when relevant.

Key Characteristics:

  • Automatic model-invoked activation based on context
  • SKILL.md + bundled resources (scripts, references, examples)
  • Metadata scanning for discovery
  • Available on Claude.ai, Claude Code, and API
  • Can bundle token-free executable scripts

When to use: Recurring domain-specific tasks requiring packaged expertise.

Claude Commands​

Claude Commands are reusable prompt workflows that provide explicit user control over execution.

Key Characteristics:

  • Manual user-invoked with /command syntax
  • Markdown files with frontmatter
  • Located in .claude/commands/
  • Claude Code only
  • Team-shareable workflow shortcuts

When to use: Team workflow shortcuts and explicit user-triggered operations.

Architectural Stack​

The ecosystem operates in distinct layers:

Layer 4: Application     → Skills (model-invoked) | Commands (user-invoked)
Layer 3: Orchestration   → Agents (autonomous) | LangChain (structured)
Layer 2: Protocol        → MCP (standardization)
Layer 1: Foundation      → Tool Calling (model capability)

Key Principles:

  1. Layer Dependencies: Each layer builds on the layer below
  2. Composability: Mix and match layers creatively
  3. Right Abstraction: Choose the appropriate layer for your use case

Integration Workflows​

Professional Services RAG System​

Goal: Query 50+ GitLab repositories with contextual understanding

  1. Foundation: Tool calling enables Claude to decide when to retrieve from vector DB
  2. Protocol: MCP servers for GitLab (code), Qdrant (vectors), Vertex AI (embeddings), Slack (context)
  3. Orchestration: Agent decides which repos to search and how to synthesize
  4. Application: Security analysis skill auto-activates and generates documentation

Claude Code Development Workflow​

Goal: Streamline development with automated review, testing, and deployment

  1. Commands: /review, /test, /security-scan, /deploy - Team-shared explicit triggers
  2. Skills: Security analysis auto-runs on commits, test generation activates on new features
  3. MCP: GitHub (PRs), Linear (tasks), Sentry (errors), Jenkins (CI/CD)
  4. Foundation: Tool calling enables all command, skill, and MCP tool invocations

Best Practices​

Start Simple​

Begin with tool calling. Add MCP when you need multiple integrations. Add agents/frameworks when orchestration becomes complex.

Choose the Right Abstraction​

  • Don't use agents for deterministic workflows
  • Don't reinvent what MCP solves
  • Use workflows (Skills/Commands/LangChain) for well-defined tasks
  • Use agents when flexibility justifies the complexity

Consider Vendor Lock-in​

  • Open Standards: MCP, tool calling (portable)
  • Proprietary: Claude Skills/Commands (Claude-specific)
  • Framework-Dependent: LangChain (framework lock-in)

Progressive Enhancement​

Build from the bottom up: Foundation → Protocol → Orchestration → Application

Learn More​

Visit the interactive diagram for:

  • Visual Venn diagrams of each layer
  • Comprehensive comparison tables
  • Deep dive into agents
  • Real-world integration examples
  • Complete architectural stack visualization

Key Takeaways​

  • Different Layers: These technologies operate at different architectural layers and serve distinct purposes
  • Complementary Systems: They're not competing alternatives - they work together
  • Agents Are Different: Agents provide autonomy at the cost of predictability
  • Trade-offs Matter: Autonomy vs. control, flexibility vs. predictability, simplicity vs. power